SC notice to Maharashtra government on bar girls’ plea
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Thursday issued notice to the Maharashtra government on a plea filed by an association of women dancers, waitresses, singers and other performers working in bars and hotels.
In their petition, the association has challenged the constitutional validity of a 2016 state law putting conditions on dance performances in restaurants and bars.
A division bench of Justice Dipak Misra and Justice RF Nariman sought response from the Maharashtra government on the plea filed by the Bharatiya Bargirls Union within four weeks and posted the matter for April 20.
The bench also clubbed the matter of the Bharatiya Bargirls Union along with a related matter filed by the Indian Hotel and Restaurant Association (IHRA), which challenged the constitutional validity of certain provisions of the Maharashtra Prohibition of Obscene Dance in Hotels, Restaurants and Bar Rooms and Protection of Dignity of Women Act, 2016, and the rules framed under it.
Saying that the new act “stigmatised our work”, the Bharatiya Bargirls Union has termed it as arbitrary and violative of their right to earn a livelihood through legitimate means.
It alleged that the term “obscene dance” in the act has been deliberately kept vague to allow the police to harass women performers.
The new law unreasonably interferes with free choice of expression through dramatic performances and the right of women to practise the occupation of self-expression through such dramatic performances, said the plea.
The plea read: “The act of tipping or giving gifts as a token of appreciation has been customary and an integral part of traditional dance culture. This decades-old practice is akin to those performing Mujra, Lavani (traditional Marathi song and dance) or Tamasha (traditional Marathi theatre) where performers earn their living through ‘bakshisi’ offered by the audience as a token of appreciation of the performances.”
“The said practice is widely prevalent in Maharashtra and across the country. But the act prohibits such practice contrary to traditionally accepted form of custom, thus failing to recognise that every performance deserves a prize.”